Election Results
founder
supporter
sponsor
Posted by Hal Neumann (+9582) 20 days ago
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+4
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 20 days ago
Here is what the Electoral College map would look like if Trump only won in states that have blown a 25 point lead in the Super Bowl.

Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 20 days ago
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+3
moderator
founder
Posted by David Schott (+15777) 19 days ago
Q: Why can't Trump stay in the White House?

A: Because it's forBiden.
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+7
founder
supporter
sponsor
Posted by Hal Neumann (+9582) 19 days ago
Top
supporter
Posted by Hanson (+1254) 19 days ago
Trump is on TV sniveling and whining about some sort of fraud in the election process.

Fraud is not result driven. A 90% return is not an indication, let alone proof, of fraud. Fraud is always fact based. The only fact driven indication of actual voter fraud is Trump and his allies activities.

Lest anyone forgets, Trump, ignoring the danger poised by the virus, harped upon the Republicans to avoid voting by mail and only vote in person. Meanwhile, he did everything he could do to wreck and interfere with the postal service. Well, that didn’t work.

We served him with our 3-month Notice to Vacate the premises. (White House) If he fails to vacate the premises it may be necessary to prosecute an Unlawful Detainer action for an Order to Vacate. If he ignores that court order the US Marshall service will have to evict him. (Cattle prod time)
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+8
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 18 days ago
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+4
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 18 days ago
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+6
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 18 days ago
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+2
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 18 days ago
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 18 days ago
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+3
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 18 days ago
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+5
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 18 days ago
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+2
moderator
founder
Posted by David Schott (+15777) 17 days ago


permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+3
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+10775) 17 days ago
tRump failed. tRumpism, sadly, lives on.
Top
Posted by Frank Burns (+231) 16 days ago
This makes me think of a certain church here in town.

permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+3
supporter
Posted by tom regan (+1917) 16 days ago
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+2
supporter
Posted by Hanson (+1254) 16 days ago
Frank Burns wrote.....

“This makes me think of a certain church here in town.”

They have made wonderful advances in mental institutions of late. These wingnuts need some serious mental adjustments, help if you will....
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+1
supporter
Posted by Robert Martelle (+445) 16 days ago
And now heads are rolling. Anybody in the administration who had even the semblance of a backbone and told Trump that what he wanted was not legal or gave information that he did not agree with is being fired.
The Trump campaign is keeping a "naughty and nice" list of Republican members of Congress who do not demonstrate absolute support of him. Sounds like McCarthyism.
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+2
moderator
founder
Posted by David Schott (+15777) 14 days ago
permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+3
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 14 days ago


permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+2
supporter
Posted by tom regan (+1917) 13 days ago
Cry baby sore losers.

permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+3
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 13 days ago


permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+2
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+15417) 6 days ago


permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+3
supporter
Posted by tom regan (+1917) 4 days ago
Pennslyvania judge throws out Trump's lawsuit challenging election results in that state.

https://www.usatoday.com/...360749002/

"This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated," Brann wrote in the 37-page decision.

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption," he wrote. "Instead, this court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, ... unsupported by evidence.

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state."

permalink   ·  vote tally
Top
+6