Posted by (+286) 7 years ago
There seem to be many that pontificate, in these forums, who have "Way too much" time on their hands. This enables them to surf the net, download and post links, and portray themselves as pseudo-intellectuals when their only true intent is to demean, ridicule, and slander the object of their scorn in the interest of making themselves seem superior to others and boost their own ego. Rather than attempt to "Throw someone under the bus", so to speak, why don't you explain and prove why you are right and better? Or is that actually not possible? In the political arena it's easy to say what you feel is wrong with a candidate. Why not state what you know is right with the one you support? Is your's so bad that this isn't possible or is it simply easier to
"slam" someone else? Our politicians say they are more important and worth more pay than we, the ones that pay them, are but they act so childish, bullish, and dishonestly that I think a high schooler could do a much better job.
Now that I've violated my #1 principle which is "It's better to remain silent an be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt" I will close and allow all to correct my grammar, spelling and explain to me why I'm wrong. Please feel free.
"slam" someone else? Our politicians say they are more important and worth more pay than we, the ones that pay them, are but they act so childish, bullish, and dishonestly that I think a high schooler could do a much better job.
Now that I've violated my #1 principle which is "It's better to remain silent an be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt" I will close and allow all to correct my grammar, spelling and explain to me why I'm wrong. Please feel free.