David, I saw that, but something doesn't jive. In the story, that was just a - thus far - unsubstantiated or unconfirmed statement made by the bank, which is the defendant. Not sure the Montana Human Rights Bureau has subpoena power to reach emails, but maybe they do. But the courts sure can. They can reach emails sent from or received on work computers, whether a work or personal email address, or to/from personal computers or devices used while at work. Would three women in a small town risk damaged reputations by falsely accusing someone of such things? I hope not, but don't know for sure.
I hope the paper gives equal space to the outcome, so we know the complete truth.
