Custer County Democrats....LOL
Posted by Landen Yanez (+37) 8 years ago
Did anybody else see the "Custer County Democrats" at the fair??? I thought that was so cute. I didnt know Montana had any Dems i thought it was all common sense folk lol.
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11757) 8 years ago
Nice to know the Republicans are all six year olds.

For heavens sake! Grow up. We live in a two party system and we should respect that, even if we disagree with the other side. I was very polite and chatty to both booth occupants because I am an ADULT and was brought up to be well-mannered.

I even admired the Republicans stuffed elephant doll. Perfect for the six year old mindset.
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2706) 8 years ago
Yes I did see it. It is a very informational booth, dispelling some Republican talking points. You might have learned something if you took the opportunity as it presented itself.

By common sense do you mean putting a noose in your political booth?

[This message has been edited by Kelly (8/24/2013)]
Top
moderator
founder
Posted by David Schott (+17069) 8 years ago
Landen is so cute. You go, big guy.
Top
supporter
Posted by Bridgier (+9197) 8 years ago
It's scary to think that Landen's going to get the franchise in only a few short years...
Top
banned
Posted by coffeedrunk (+58) 8 years ago
Funny thing about the democraps.

About a month or two back, there was a subject on this site, about what our founding fathers would think of our society today. A bunch of liberal progressive democraps said they(our founders) would love it, citing that they(our founders) had made the constitution with room for growth and change, which some how made our founders progressives. Well now it comes out that the Department of Defense put out a training manual stating that the founders would be nothing more than criminal terrorist because they supported individual liberties rather than the collective ideals to which liberals support.
You Progressive liberals just won't learn until the truth hits closer to home, such as it did for the ex WWII veteran that was beat to death in the most violent hate crime in the history of the United States. Here is a link to support my words.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/162321199/2161-docs#page=35
or Google Delbert Belton
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11757) 8 years ago
And this is what is wrong with this country. It's all if you aren't with me, you are the enemy and I have to resort to school yard name calling.
We can't all be regressives, simply because time does not move backwards, no matter how much some people want it to. We will move into the future even if we don't want to.
We need to figure out a way to WORK TOGETHER on REASONABLE COMPROMISE they way the government did a generation ago, when we still had a two party system but it was functional.
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17343) 8 years ago
Well now it comes out that the Department of Defense put out a training manual stating that the founders would be nothing more than criminal terrorist because they supported individual liberties rather than the collective ideals to which liberals support.


Please tell me which page in your link says such a thing:

http://www.scribd.com/doc...cs#page=35

It is 133 pages long. I skimmed over it, and found no where that said the founders would be terrorists today.

Yes, I am calling you a bald-faced liar.

And regarding Delbert Belton. It would seem you are advocating the lynching of the suspects in his murder. If so, you are a clay-eating cracker who should be sent back in a time machine to 1930.

And to Amorette: Not all Republicans are equivalent to coffeedrunk and his racist Tea Party ilk. We just need these old white people to die, and the next generation of Republicans to take the party back. Unfortunately, modern medicine just keeps coming up with ways to keep these old crackers around.
Top
Posted by Landen Yanez (+37) 8 years ago
Ha! Nice to see you used me as a representation for "all Republicans" i'm one guy, not all of them. But hey, nothing says "i dont fish, hunt, or pray" like an Obama bumper sticker.
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11757) 8 years ago
So, you judge everyone's politics by their hobbies? Meet Hal Neumann, boyo. The guy who lives in Alaska and subsistence fishes and hunts. Hal, introduce yourself to this child and give him an education. He needs one.
Top
banned
Posted by coffeedrunk (+58) 8 years ago
Page two, I copied and pasted it to the point of which it says anyone whom advocates the use of force or violence. It is well known that our founders believed in replacing by force a tyrannical ruler or government. Whether or not we have one now is irrelevant, but the fact that they prescribed to this belief is. This belief is only one of many that the government says would make them terrorist. And to hell with your two party system of control, or should I say divide and conquer. May Delbert rest in peace, and may justice be swift and exact.

Prohibited Activities

Individuals who hold extremist views are in conflict with the standards expected of all military members, and participation in extremism is inconsistent with the duties of military service. b.

According toDoDDirective 1325.6, military members are prohibited from any of thefollowing activities:

Participating in organizations that espouse supremacist causes.
Attempting to create illegal discrimination based on race, creed, color, sex,religion, or national origin.

Advocating the use of force or violence.
Top
supporter
sponsor
Posted by Hannah Nash (+2495) 8 years ago
Gunnar: whereas I think the Republican party has some serious soul-searching to do, the younger set is still learning some of the hideous behavior of the Tea Party ilk (that the current Repubs are STILL pandering to). How do you propose to steer the younger generation back into the tenants of decent Republicanism so they can actually use the phrase "Grand Old Party" without lying about the word "Grand"?

I am all for better political parties, better candidates, and MORE choices come voting time. We should not be trapped into a single party or ideology.
Top
supporter
Posted by Wendy Wilson (+6165) 8 years ago
Ha! Nice to see you used me as a representation for "all Republicans" i'm one guy, not all of them. But hey, nothing says "i dont fish, hunt, or pray" like an Obama bumper sticker.


Wow. I'd better tell my hunter, church elder husband that he shouldn't have voted for Obama twice.
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+14950) 8 years ago
Having observed both booths firsthand, the democrats have a lot of information about their party, positions, and candidates. The GOP has little information like this. My conclusion is that republicans don't want to put anything in writing anymore. You'll can draw your own conclusions about why that might be. (Apologies to Wendy for ending that last sentence with a preposition. )
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17343) 8 years ago
Thank you for answering my question, coffeedrunk. You posted:

Participating in organizations that espouse supremacist causes.
Attempting to create illegal discrimination based on race, creed, color, sex,religion, or national origin.


So you believe the founders of the Great Country of the United States of America would still be, in this enlightened age, racist SOBs who want to keep the NEGRO IN CHAINS????!!!!!??????

I spit at your argument. Ptuey, Ptuey, Ptuey. George FREAKIN' Washington, if he were alive now, would NOT BE THE RACIST SOB that you appear to be, judging from your posts on this thread.

HOW DARE YOU INSINUATE THE FATHER OF OUR COUNTRY IS A RACIST???!!!???!!!

You can go back to living in your particular brand of neoFacist totalarianism.....I will go back to respecting the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!!!

(PS: If any normal people has read through my diatribe at this point to be still reading, thank you for your time. )
Top
founder
supporter
sponsor
Posted by Hal Neumann (+9922) 8 years ago
Amorette, yes, I live in Sovonoski (traditional name) or King Salmon as it shows on modern maps. Yes, Susan and I subsistence fish (and hunt a bit).

Politically? I am a life-long Democrat. I pretty much suck at being a Liberal, but I am damned good Democrat, if I do say so myself.

And while I very much enjoy discussing (even debating) politics & current events - I've just grown bored with ARGUING about politics on the internet. So, I'll decline your kind invite to dialog with the person in question.

After many years of arguing politics I finally figured out that the way elections are won is by registering voters and getting out the vote. That's the most productive way I can support causes and candidates that are reflective of my own core-values. Arguing on the internet . . . meh . . . not so productive.
= = = = = = =

Taken as a whole, the Bush most often goes Democrat in general elections, while Anchorage goes Republicans. Since over half the state's voters live in Los Anchorage that means Alaska is typically classified as Red state.

Local politics / state-wide ballot measures and the like are often far more interesting - the political mix in the Bush just makes for good elections.

Of the 350 people who live in our little village, I'd guess voters are evenly split between registered Independents, Republicans, and Democrats.
= = = = = = =

King Salmon is an interesting place to live (for many, many reasons). While King Salmon is not in the middle of nowhere - I can stand on my front steps, throw a rock, and hit the middle of nowhere spot on the nose. Jay Hammond, Republican governor of Alaska 1974-1982, in speaking of our Borough said, "It's a great place to live, but I wouldn't want to visit there." He was on the money there.

That being said . . .I'd like to invite small government Conservatives to come visit our community and see for themselves what small government can be like in practice.
Top
Posted by ShaneF (+87) 8 years ago
We live in a two party system and we should respect that, even if we disagree with the other side.


Who lives in a what, now?
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11757) 8 years ago
Republicans are opposed to get out the vote drives these days. Even trying to outlaw them in some states. If you can't win the popular vote, suppress it.
I have a hankering for salmon for some reason. Why does talking to Hal do that to me?
Top
banned
Posted by coffeedrunk (+58) 8 years ago
You only quote the ideals you want to highlight Gunnar, The last sentence says anyone who advocates violence as a means to change government. Our founders stated plainly the we should use force to overthrow a tyrannical rule.
Top
Posted by Landen Yanez (+37) 8 years ago
Yeah you should probably tell him that. Obama is against guns and christianity, he has proven that to us. If you decide to refuse it, you need to do some research.
Top
supporter
Posted by Wendy Wilson (+6165) 8 years ago
Richard, honey. The word "be" is a verb.

Landen, could you point out what gun laws have been changed to become more restrictive during Obama's presidency? Despite my research I couldn't find any. Perhaps you could quote your source? Thank you.

[This message has been edited by Wendy Wilson (8/24/2013)]
Top
supporter
Posted by Bob L. (+5095) 8 years ago
Hey coffeedrunk, you should move to Leith, North Dakota.

You'll find some of your fellow travelers there.
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+14950) 8 years ago
Richard, honey. The word "be" is a verb.


Hmm... I don't know whether to retract my apology or just let it be. Will there be answer?

Our founders stated plainly the we should use force to overthrow a tyrannical rule.


We use still use "force". It's called a ballot box. I am curious how you think this government is tyrannical?
Obama has actually be a pretty good republican president. He could have been more progressive for my taste.
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2706) 8 years ago
Good one Bob! I hadn't heard of Leith until yesterday.

http://www.addictinginfo....take-over/
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11757) 8 years ago
I have to admit, Richard, you are right about Obama. He is a pretty good moderate Republican. I wish the Republicans were moderate Republicans, instead of letting the paranoia arm rule the party. Eisenhower must be spinning in his grave.
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17343) 8 years ago
The duly elected federal government, while disfunctional, is hardly tyrannical. Landen and coffeedrunk's statements borders on treason. Justifying revolution because the government won't let you advance your white supremacist agenda is treason, pure and simple. Randy Weaver deserved to die, for failing to lay down arms against the government. The Jordan Freemen were traitors as well.

I am done trying to discuss issues with traitors. Long live the United States of America.
Top
banned
Posted by coffeedrunk (+58) 8 years ago
White pride and treason, what are you saying? I do not see anywhere in my nor anyone else's words that we are supreme. I am glad though that you made the "ever reaching" leap to racism in order to inadequately support your feeble perspective. It seems like every time a republican or conservative speaks, a liberal shouts racism.
I was best friends with James Rogers (a member of the Ghetto boys)for many years as a young man, and went to many auditions during their tapings, so racism is out of the question whether you are intelligent enough to recognize it or not. I heard "damn it feels good to be a gangster" at the same time as the parents and grandparents of Scarface and Willie d, at their family reunion. If we were to both return to my hometown, they would rob you and kick it with me , so stop being a pandering embasile, because no group minority or not respects that.
Now I am a little more outspoken on Mexican immigration which is the main group coming here illegally. A nation without borders is a nation without security.
Top
banned
Posted by coffeedrunk (+58) 8 years ago
D.



Extremist Ideologies

1.


Introduction

As noted, an ideology is a set of political beliefs about the nature of people and society. People who are committed to an ideology seek not only to persuade but torecruit others to their belief. In U.S. history, there are many examples of extremistideologies and movements. The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule and the Confederate states who sought to secede from the Northern states are justtwo examples.


Just incase you missed this one on page 2, the founders which fought against British rule are described as terrorist. It is also important to note that Amoretti and many others on this site actively seek to persuade or recruit people to their points of view, "whether they are willing to admit it or not" which in the new DOD training manual says is an extremist tactic, making them terrorist.
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11757) 8 years ago
Oi, vey. I am a terrorist because I try to convince people to be reasonable? I do not want to live on your planet, or the famous "I have a black friend therefore I can't be racist" planet. I want to live on this one and make it better.
Top
banned
Posted by coffeedrunk (+58) 8 years ago
I don't have a black friend, he was shot to death by another black boy(verick burns), which highlights the true racial issue of black on black crime. But this issue does not fit your liberal progressive agenda, so I am sure it will never be much of a topic for a well educated but obtusely experienced chic such as yourself.
Top
supporter
sponsor
Posted by Hannah Nash (+2495) 8 years ago
So, if we are terrorists, does this mean that the Westboro Baptist Church people will be protesting me and others? Gosh, I hope so, as that's been a dream of mine!
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11757) 8 years ago
I'm chic. Why, thank you! I've never really considered myself chic.
Is black on black violence a problem. HELL YES!!! So, what would you do to stop it. Keeping everyone well-armed, of course.
You seem to assume that 'progressive' means something besides 'moving forward.' That's what we need to do. Move forward until armed violence is just a memory and everyone, of every hue, every faith, every nationality, has equal opportunities.
How is that a bad thing? How is cooperation and trying to improve the conditions of the world a bad thing? That's what I don't get about regressives. They seem to see making the world a better place as bad.
Picking and choosing to make 'the other' the enemy doesn't help, I can tell you that. I would love to talk to you seriously about how you think the world could move forward, but while complimenting me on my fashion sense is nice, I don't think it helps.
Top
banned
Posted by coffeedrunk (+58) 8 years ago
[you seem to assume that 'progressive' means something besides 'moving forward.' That's what we need to do. Move forward until armed violence is just a memory and everyone, of every hue, every faith, every nationality, has equal opportunities.]

Well you seem to assume that conservative means something besides (airing on the side of caution)

And we all want to improve our world for the next generation, but you only recognize your form of change as acceptable, that is an extremist view. Maybe some people want a different lifestyle for their future offspring. Would you deny them the right to choose as a parent what they see as fit for their children?

This thing called tolerance seems to be a fleeting memory to the progressives, now that they think they have the upper hand in social engineering of the future generations. I think taking the diversity of lifestyles away from people will only lead to the unraveling of the progressive plan, mainly because the plan is only geared towards one goal. Once the world knows this goal, a large scale backlash will begin. Progressives need to distance themselves from their extremist ideology before it consumes what was once a noble cause of equality for all.
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+14950) 8 years ago
I'm not going to sit idle by and allow coffeedrunk or any other "conservative" to define the goals of progressives. The goals of progressives are rather simple. Despite your rhetoric, progressives do NOT envision a society where government takes care of them cradle to grave.

Rather, progressives want a government that implements policies that consider the general welfare of the nation.They want ALL children, regardless of race to have equal opportunity at the American dream. They want a clean environment. They want a healthy and productive people. They don't want people to be at the mercy of massive corporations. They want fairness for all. They understand that the secret to all of this is a strong and vibrant middle class.

Pretty simple.
Top
supporter
Posted by cj sampsel (+479) 8 years ago
Better to be a democrap than a republicant or republiwont.
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4461) 8 years ago
coffeedrunk wrote:
I don't have a black any friend(s)


That's more like it, you racist piece of poop. You want to call some black kids robbing a white guy the racist crime of the century and then tell us how you'd kick it with the Ghetto Boys? What a load of horse poop. You want to reverse eighty years of progress toward equality because you think white men have it so procreateing tough and you call that conservatism, no procreateing wonder your band of well-funded racists can only win elections in the most backward hick states in the country. Go procreate yourself.

And Landen, pull your head out of your ass and you'll realize why you have to look for friends on craigslist and milescity.com (and continue to fail finding any).

In summation, procreate you.
Top
banned
Posted by coffeedrunk (+58) 8 years ago
tell us how you'd kick it with the Ghetto Boys?

I didn't tell you how I would kick it with the ghetto Boys, I said I did kick it with them. Furthermore when I would meet Willie an James in the acres homes region on the north side, they would tell me don't go in the hood, meet them at Long john silvers on the outs of the community. Their reason was because black folks don't like yall white devils, and you probably will not come out alive. They admitted to me several times that blacks are very discriminatory against non blacks.

Now it is important to remember that I never said anything about race until I asked a question to amoretti, so if it doesn't apply let it fly. However since you people are apparently jumping out of you skin to defend a way of life and a goal that I never specified, that says all of the words that I did not say. You are the true racist, and I hope you can stop thinking along those lines, because we are all the human race. If you only see race when you see others, you are missing a lot in life, and that view of life will eventually eat you up. Stop seeing brown and white and yellow and black, and just live a good life.
Top
supporter
Posted by Wendy Wilson (+6165) 8 years ago
Still waiting, Landen.
Top
Posted by DJ4 (+183) 8 years ago
your kidding me. One sentence you say black's hate white "devils" next sentence we are one race??? wtf

[This message has been edited by DJ4 (8/26/2013)]

[This message has been edited by DJ4 (8/26/2013)]
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17343) 8 years ago
A great question which I failed to answer when the first time I read, being how totally pissed I was at clay-eating crackers:

Gunnar: whereas I think the Republican party has some serious soul-searching to do, the younger set is still learning some of the hideous behavior of the Tea Party ilk (that the current Repubs are STILL pandering to). How do you propose to steer the younger generation back into the tenants of decent Republicanism so they can actually use the phrase "Grand Old Party" without lying about the word "Grand"?


Hannah, the souls of today's young Republicans definitely causes me concern. While I see the children of my Miles City Republican friends abandoning the GOP without the blink of an eye, the dumber, stupider meth addict ilk are soon to blame their present day woes on any newcomer they see, whether their skin has a particular color or not.

How to deal with the young stupid drug addict crackers, like coffeedrunk's kids, I do not have an answer for that.

But I still think education is the best answer to move this country forward.
Top
supporter
sponsor
Posted by Hannah Nash (+2495) 8 years ago
Gunnar: glad it wasn't my question that pissed you off (hopefully). And I fully agree with you regarding education. One of my favorite authors for teens spoke on why he is perfectly happy to pay taxes even though he doesn't have any children in school: "Because I don't like living in a country with a bunch of stupid people." ~ John Green.

Hoping everyone around here feels similarly.

Richard: +100 for thriving middle class!!!
Top
Posted by Skye (+381) 8 years ago
Umm...the horse is dead...but continue on!!!
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+14950) 8 years ago
coffeeintoxocated wrote:
However since you people are apparently jumping out of you skin to defend a way of life and a goal that I never specified, that says all of the words that I did not say. You are the true racist, and I hope you can stop thinking along those lines, because we are all the human race. If you only see race when you see others, you are missing a lot in life, and that view of life will eventually eat you up.


Umm... I agree with your last sentence. All human blood is red and the color of someones skin is of no consequence.

However, you may want to do some research on which party is currently busy creating barriers to free elections and other such gerrymandering. (Hint: it isn't the party with the donkey icon.) Your assertion that progressives are racist because they are trying to provide equality in opportunity to people of all races is offensive ! I recommend that you recant and retract.

Anecdotally, I can tell you that the mixed-race community in which I currently reside is cellar FULL of "white whine" from people who are proud parishioners of Clear Channel's "Angry White Man Radio" and Fox News. I have never seen such vile and ugly behavior and racial prejudice in all my life from people who are supporters of the Tea Party wing of the GOP. You don't observe progressives speaking in this manner.
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4461) 8 years ago
tell us how you'd kick it with the Ghetto Boys?

I didn't tell you how I would kick it with the ghetto Boys, I said I did kick it with them. Furthermore when I would meet Willie an James in the acres homes region on the north side, they would tell me don't go in the hood, meet them at Long john silvers on the outs of the community. Their reason was because black folks don't like yall white devils, and you probably will not come out alive. They admitted to me several times that blacks are very discriminatory against non blacks.

Now it is important to remember that I never said anything about race until I asked a question to amoretti, so if it doesn't apply let it fly. However since you people are apparently jumping out of you skin to defend a way of life and a goal that I never specified, that says all of the words that I did not say. You are the true racist, and I hope you can stop thinking along those lines, because we are all the human race. If you only see race when you see others, you are missing a lot in life, and that view of life will eventually eat you up. Stop seeing brown and white and yellow and black, and just live a good life.


I don't see race, I see bullsh*t.
Top
Posted by Elizabeth Emilsson (+797) 8 years ago
Gee, I miss Fair Time in Miles City. I remember manning the Custer County Democrats booth watching people like Landen and Coffeedrunk slink by furtively like they were going to catch a liberal "virus" We used to have a survey to fill out to win a "free" chance for a prize. A lot of intelligent Republicans actually would stop and engage in lively discussions. ( Intelligent Republican wasn't necessarily an oxymoron.)
Top
banned
Posted by coffeedrunk (+58) 8 years ago
DJ4 says

[your kidding me. One sentence you say black's hate white "devils" next sentence we are one race??? wtf ]

You must not be able to read, I said Willie and James told me to meet them on the outs of acre homes, because blacks in the hood do not like the white devil.

I did not say that I believe blacks hate white devils. Stop putting a spin on words to try and win a debate. You should leave the debating to those of us whom are not intellectually challenged. It is important to read a post and not misinterpret it to fit your own biased views when talking with the big boys.
Top
Posted by DJ4 (+183) 8 years ago
I scoop enough poop of my lawn, don't need to shovel yours.
Top
banned
Posted by coffeedrunk (+58) 8 years ago
Use spell check next time.
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17343) 8 years ago
HahhaahhaaaaahhhaaaaHAAAHHAAAHHAAAA!!!!!

THIS IS RICH!

ONE WHITE RACIST CRACKER GIVING ANOTHER WHITE RACIST CRACKER ADVICE ON THE INTERNET TO USE SPELL CHECK TO MAKE EACH OTHER LOOK LESS STUPID!!!

Whew.....gotta wipe the tears of laughter from my face.

Actually, the real resolution for you trailer park white trash, is to go back to making meth in those little metal sheds y'all have on your property, and quit trying to debate the adults on THAT THERE DADGUM INTRANET!!!!
Top
Posted by Brandon Loomis (+96) 8 years ago
Landen I'm not sure why you started another thread on things to do here in MC looks like you've found a pretty good past time. Feeding the trolls of MC.com.

I love how Amorette states how she is accepting of our two party system then says Republicans need to grow up then calls all Republicans 6 year olds. Hi kettle my name is pot, nice to meet you.
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17343) 8 years ago
Hmmmm......interesting thought. It helps me with my New Evolved Theory of The Republican Brain.

Those of you who consider yourselves Republican, are you:

(A) Rich

(B) Racist

(C) Because my parents were (Note: that is the default answer for having the brain of a 6-year old)

(D) Other? This answer requires a post, as no intelligent person can be a Republican for reasons outside of the three reasons posted above.

Thank you, and enjoy your look in the mirror.
Top
moderator
founder
Posted by David Schott (+17069) 8 years ago
(D) Other: I ain't rich now but someday I plan to be. It's only a matter of time.
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17343) 8 years ago
(D) Other: I ain't rich now but someday I plan to be. It's only a matter of time. As long as we keep those fruit pickers from Mexico out of our country.

Fixed that one for you, Dave.
Top
banned
Posted by coffeedrunk (+58) 8 years ago
David nor anyone else said anything about race, why do you (Gunnar) continue to let someone's ethnic background dictate your every response in life. Stop hating people because they are different than you.
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17343) 8 years ago
? - sorry coffeedrunk, I don't think Dave is a racist, in fact Dave is a great guy and is most tolerant of anybody.

You, on the other hand, are a certified racist. Period.
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4461) 8 years ago
Let me get this for you, coffee drunk.

"No I ain't, I knew a black guy once."
Top