Should the law apply to medical marijuana growers?
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17321) 8 years ago
Should federal law apply to persons growing medical marijuana in full compliance with Montana statues?

YES or NO?

Please....only answer YES or NO....DO NOT POST ANYTHING MORE THAN YES OR NO ON MY THREAD!!! I WILL NOT TOLERATE IT!!!!
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeff Denton (+763) 8 years ago
Well I don't know much about Montana statues but they look okay when you're stoned. Unlike Greek statues which don't comply much with modern dress code, as I recall if you're on Ouzo it's hilarious.
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeri Dalbec (+3243) 8 years ago
NO...It might only be for ground cover:-)
Top
Posted by Oddjob (+194) 8 years ago
Yes.
Top
Posted by Steve Sullivan (+1333) 8 years ago
All Federal laws regarding everything but growing medical weed - yes
Growing weed - no

Pass the Cheetos dude.
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17321) 8 years ago
Oddjob, thank you.

The rest of you....FOCUS!!! This is a YES or NO thread! No digressions will be tolerated!!!!!!!
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeri Dalbec (+3243) 8 years ago
It is difficult to respond to yes or no threats:-)
Top
supporter
Posted by Bob Netherton II (+1905) 8 years ago
Yes.
Top
supporter
Posted by Bob Netherton II (+1905) 8 years ago
No.
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+14950) 8 years ago
Moo

You're a bell-cow.
Top
Posted by Joel reagor (+182) 8 years ago
yes or no
Top
banned
Posted by SD (+1525) 8 years ago
Yes Joel , you took my answer dammit.
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17321) 8 years ago
I count 7 letters, bugger off.
Top
banned
Posted by SD (+1525) 8 years ago
Wasn` talking to you. Was talking to Joel.
Top
Posted by Wayne White (+255) 8 years ago
F N NO
Top
moderator
founder
Posted by David Schott (+17052) 8 years ago
Joel reagor wrote:
"yes or no"

SD wrote:
"Yes Joel , you took my answer dammit."

Gunnar Emilsson wrote:
"I count 7 letters, bugger off."

SD wrote:
"Wasn` talking to you. Was talking to Joel."

"7 letters", "SD". What makes you think Gunnar was talking to you? Counting is another thing you have trouble with?
Top
banned
Posted by SD (+1525) 8 years ago
What says I was talkin to Gunnar.
Top
moderator
founder
Posted by David Schott (+17052) 8 years ago
SD wrote:
"What says I was talkin to Gunnar."

Because Gunnar was the only other person who posted after Joel did, genius. There is no one else you could have been responding to while stating your response was intended for Joel.
Top
supporter
Posted by cj sampsel (+479) 8 years ago
Well,uh,let me think for a minute,man. Uhm, what was the question again?
Top
Posted by EJR (+40) 8 years ago
Is this a quiz, or a request for opinions?
Top
Posted by Elizabeth Emilsson (+797) 8 years ago
no
Top
Posted by Spencer Haynes (+260) 8 years ago
No
Top
Posted by Donald Mullikin (+140) 8 years ago
No!

Congress and or the President have no authority in this case!
Federal Laws regulating controlled substances violate the Constitution as any law enacted by congress is not within their scope of authority. Read Article 1 Section 8 to understand what I am saying.

http://www.usconstitution...1Sec8.html

http://www.usconstitution...2Sec1.html

From the later link.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."


As you can see the president has been violating his Oath of Office for the last 4 years and I see no change in the short future.
Top
Posted by Cactus Plains (+96) 8 years ago
NO
Top