Electrified Fence for Homosexuals
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2736) 10 years ago
Again it? I guess "st" is too hard to pronounce. I love Christians who use The Holy Bible as The Holy Hate Manual.

Top
supporter
Posted by howdy (+4949) 10 years ago
Disgusting!!!
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
Sir... I have a question: Do you seriously believe that God will judge someone for loving a person of the same sex, but not judge you for hating someone you have never met?
Top
Posted by Kacey (+3153) 10 years ago
Sad thing is as a "Pastor" people will believe his words came straight from God!!

He is a sick twisted individual and does NOT speak for the God I believe in!
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
I'm wit'em cause I'm again it. It's just be wrong when 2 boys get it on, cause they get along (too well). Ain't much a nutting worse than broke back boys. An deem broke leg gals be jus as evil, gotta take their say so way, god demand it. You wit God or da devil. Eyes be wit God, and again tha devil, may the lord Jehova make'em touch dat lectric fance. May Ubama touch that lectric fance too, help us out here o'mercyful lord, us keepers of the faith. Stop these queers for they damn us all with their wickedness. And please help Luke rudkowski in his struggle, I ask this here of ya God?
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
And there you have it. milescity has spoken.
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
You procreateing hack, I am sure there is a law against that.
Top
Posted by Josh Rath (+2311) 10 years ago
That is one username that shouldn't be allowed. But then again, they CLEARLY speak for Miles City... Anyone got an electric fence we can use?
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeri Dalbec (+3266) 10 years ago
During her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant
Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus
18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following
response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, written by James Kaufman of Virginia, and
posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:
Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's
Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that
knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend
the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that
Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination ... End of
debate.
I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other
elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.
1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male
and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A
friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not
Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned
in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a
fair price for her?
3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is
in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24. The problem
is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it
creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my
neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I
smite them?
5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath.
Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally
obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?
6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is
an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than
homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there
'degrees' of abomination?
7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if
I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading
glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some
wiggle-room here?
8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the
hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by
Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig
makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two
different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing
garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester
blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really
necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town
together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to
death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep
with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy
considerable expertise in such matters, so I'm confident you can help.
Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and
unchanging.
Your adoring fan.
James M. Kauffman,
Ed.D. Professor Emeritus,
Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education
University of Virginia


PS (It would be a damn shame if we couldn't own a Canadian)
Top
supporter
sponsor
Posted by Frank Hardy (+1650) 10 years ago
Fantastic letter. Thanks for posting it.

FH
Top
Posted by Mufasa (+86) 10 years ago
Sarah Palin can own Russians!
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11902) 10 years ago
As they slide into the dark ages, these poor bigots get more and more frantic. The ship is sinking and they know it, but they aren't smart enough to head for the lifeboats.
Top
Posted by Kacey (+3153) 10 years ago
Thank you for sharing that Jeri! It's perfect.
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2736) 10 years ago
His rant is not without consequences...

http://www.au.org/media/p...dium=email
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
Jeri, you asked if there were degrees of abominations. Well this should go without saying, as there are degrees of crimes. 1st degree, 2nd degree etc. There are plenty of references to crimes or abominations being met with their suitable punishments in the good book. Likewise there are plenty of nowadays exmples of different punishments for different crimes. We even have sayings to the effect of let the punishment fit the crime. Certainly a crime as high as Sodomy and Homosexuality are very high on the list, or they would not have been the reason for the destruction of an entire city such as Sodom and gomorra. It is wrong, and only morally bad people would attempt to justify it. If you allow homosexuals in your town, than God will judge you as them, the same.
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4454) 10 years ago
I'll take a gay over a moron, every day.
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeri Dalbec (+3266) 10 years ago
Oh gosh...I am not a good one to argue. You are certainly entitled to your opinion. I just cannot go there. Passing judgement on others is just not one of my things. Over the years I have had teachers, friends and family members who were and are "gay". Wonderful, productive and intelligent people. You miss so much in life when you limit yourself to someone else's words and opinions...but, again...it is certainly your life and I don't fault you. Just "live and let live":-)
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
milescity said:
Jeri, you asked if there were degrees of abominations. Well this should go without saying, as there are degrees of crimes. 1st degree, 2nd degree etc. There are plenty of references to crimes or abominations being met with their suitable punishments in the good book. Likewise there are plenty of nowadays exmples of different punishments for different crimes. We even have sayings to the effect of let the punishment fit the crime. Certainly a crime as high as Sodomy and Homosexuality are very high on the list, or they would not have been the reason for the destruction of an entire city such as Sodom and gomorra. It is wrong, and only morally bad people would attempt to justify it. If you allow homosexuals in your town, than God will judge you as them, the same.


Assuming the story is true, (I reject that premise) Sodom & Gomorrah were not judge for being homosexual. The Bible never says what specific wickedness they committed that caused them to be judged. The story isn't about homosexuality, it is about violent gang rape.

Jude 1:7 just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an [b] example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire.


"indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh" is "sarkos heteras" in the original greek. Homosexuality cannot be the issue here because the flesh they were pursuing is called "heteras" meaning different. This the same word from which we obtain the "hetero" as in heterosexual- the exact opposite of what we must find if the sin of Sodom was "homo" sexual.
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4454) 10 years ago
What do the Grizzlies have to do with this?
Top
supporter
Posted by Bob L. (+5100) 10 years ago
$20 says milescity wants to suck dick. Or already has. One of those.
Top
supporter
Posted by Bob L. (+5100) 10 years ago
Repressed homosexuality is so, so sad.
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Tucker Bolton (+3697) 10 years ago
Phone them, phone them all. Phone the stuckers, I say!
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
Tucker Bolton wrote:
Phone them, phone them all. Phone the stuckers, I say!


Ummm... so is your phone battery is dead and you can't play angry birds and listen to banjo music this morning???
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
Wrong again Bob L. You are the only broke back here. My wife is just as hot today after ten years as she was when we meet. Never had an inclination for any homo acts, nor do I think we should allow others to have these inclinations(publically or privately). So keep your false accusations to yourself, or come to my house to levy any allegations to my face. You are and always have been on the side of the devil, and you will be judged acorddingly.
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
I sure would like to know your last name Bob L.
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2736) 10 years ago
And the rest of us would like to know your name as well. A$$hat.
Top
supporter
Posted by Bridgier (+9297) 10 years ago
I believe his name is Daniel K. Allen. He's been banned from mc.com repeatedly.
Top
supporter
Posted by Bob L. (+5100) 10 years ago
milescity: Methinks thou dost protest too much.
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4454) 10 years ago
His mouth is full, but his hands are free to type.
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
Kelly I have placed my name and address all over this site, for the communist to see. I am at 815 n 2nd st. and I hate commy scum, but i love Christian Americans who beleive in the constitution. I'll leave yall alone for a few days (commies).

[This message has been edited by milescity (5/24/2012)]
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17668) 10 years ago
Die commie scum!
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Tucker Bolton (+3697) 10 years ago
Richard, you do realize it was a spoonerism, right?
Top
supporter
Posted by Bridgier (+9297) 10 years ago
I think this lady's ready to debate on mc.com:
Top
Posted by Jeremy Orthman (+440) 10 years ago
miles,

Are you saying you've never committed any type of Sodomy in any form?
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
Tucker Bolton wrote:
Richard, you do realize it was a spoonerism, right?


Hmmm... I thought it was a marrowsky.
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
Richard this arguement can only be resolved when you realize the ends of the ideals that you and yours are proposing end with one world economic systems, one race (ethnic group), and one religion. If you can not realize that, then I will continue to change(broaden)the topics that are being discussed in order to show you that your ends are not justified.
Furthermore there is a book that described all of this, for all the world will come against the decendants of Abraham (isrealites), then he will return.
Your plan will bring about premonocta, and murder of all white men and women. As chick norris has recently said, this is a war against white americans especially christians.
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
I have never proposed any such thing.
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11902) 10 years ago
I wonder if the extra heavy tin foil would work better as a hat?
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2736) 10 years ago
Is chick norris the wife of Chuck Norris?
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4454) 10 years ago
When is a dumbass going to realize the zero sum game is a product of bad propaganda?
Top
Posted by Kacey (+3153) 10 years ago
Stacey Pritchard has to take the medal for the stupidest woman I've heard in a while. She makes Sarah Palin sound smart. And for those of you who know me, you know that's saying something!!!

Hey Stacey...Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if
I have a defect in my sight.

GET THEE BEHIND AN ELECTRIFIED FENCE! You have violated God's word by having those glasses!

[This message has been edited by Kacey (5/25/2012)]
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
milescity said:
Richard this arguement can only be resolved when you realize the ends of the ideals that you and yours are proposing end with one world economic systems, one race (ethnic group), and one religion


Since you are the one making this claim the burden of proof lies with you to make your case. What evidence can you offer that:

-such a proposal for one world government even exists?

-that part of that plan is we become one "ethnic group", how is that even possible?

-that we could ever become one religion? (unless there is a world wide abandonment of the concept of god)

-Even if all of this is does happen, why would it necessarily be "bad"?

milescity said:
Furthermore there is a book that described all of this, for all the world will come against the decendants of Abraham (isrealites), then he will return.


I assume this book is the bible? Funny thing the main character in that book says things like "this generation shall not pass away before the main character (who made the prediction in the first place) returns (paraphrasing Mt 24). Revelation 1:3 says "Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near.

None of that happened in the generation that the main character was speaking about. Why say "the time is near" and then take roughly 2000 years (and counting) to show up?
Why would a loving god punish his chosen people(Israel)while whisking all of the gentiles Christians off of the face of the earth during a tribulation and then bring them back when the trouble passes.

Any book with such a poor tract record of predicting events that didn't happen WHEN they were supposed to occur should be abandoned and not given any further credence.
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4454) 10 years ago
It's still a decent piece of literature. I understand it's loosely based on the Matrix.
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
http://kdvr.com/2012/05/2...y-a-woman/

Interesting story. What should we do about this, milescity?
Top
Posted by SLA (+175) 10 years ago
I must agree with you. Gay's have every right to be as miserable as Hetrosexual couples.

Ha!

Stavie Love
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago


Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11902) 10 years ago
In much of Europe, this is how it works. The contract that counts is the civil one. The marriage is just a fancy party for friends. I think we should separate the two here. People often get married on one day and throw a big party at their church the next. The one that counts for legal purposes is the civil part.

Rather than so-called 'separate but equal,' just make a marriage a civil contract and weddings a religious party with no actual legal standing.
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeri Dalbec (+3266) 10 years ago
I hope you don't mind if I interject something here. I really have no emotion whatsoever about who someone chooses to marry or hang out with, but I do QUESTION the use of the word "GAY' which meant, as per my 1941 Webster's Practical Illustrated Dictionary, New Census Edition..."MERRY; FULL OF MIRTH; BRIGHT-COLORED; GIVEN TO PLEASURE". Having graduated from High School 1n 1954, I have signed annuals alluding to "the gayest times", "the gayest this and the gayest that". All about good times!

If someone has information concerning the conversion of the word
GAY", I would appreciate knowing and thank you in advance for your help.
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2736) 10 years ago
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeri Dalbec (+3266) 10 years ago
Thank you, Kelly. Very interesting. Sorry I did not think of Wikipedia. Amazing how many different words have bounced back and forth in an effort to be politically correct and then to stick with "Gay". Reminds me a bit of the Swastika which before Hitler had a happy meaning and was embossed on my Grandparents Wedding folder. Shocked when I saw it and then looked it up. Thank you again.
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11902) 10 years ago
In Jane Austen's time, the word 'nice' was undergoing a flux in meaning. It had meant 'insipid' but was now moving to 'pleasant.' We don't know what Miss Austen meant when she wrote in a letter she went to a 'nice' party because the word could have either meaning at the time.

Bemused. Does it mean amused or bewildered or some condition in between or having both in common? Depends on when and to whom you are speaking.

English, she is a funny language.
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeri Dalbec (+3266) 10 years ago
Interesting. Words have been fun to watch over the years. I have really had to "lighten" up in regard to usage. They were so strict in my era. I am down to "in regards to"...rather than "in regard to" being about the only thing that makes me shudder. Think what it will be like as we revert to texting verbiage:-) Now...back to electrified fences!!!
Top
Posted by Mufasa (+86) 10 years ago
Missionaries of Hate

Interesting program on how Evangelicals have traveled to Uganda to stoke anti-homosexual fervor. If it weren't for the fact that Ugandans have black skin, milescity would fit in there just fine.

http://current.com/shows/...f-hate.htm
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeri Dalbec (+3266) 10 years ago
The video is just another example of the necessity of education and best said by the following:

"The highest result of education is tolerance"...Helen Keller

and..

"Tolerance implies no lack of commitment to ONE"S OWN BELIEFS. Rather it condemns the OPRESSION or PERSECUTION of others." John F. Kennedy
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11902) 10 years ago
What are these people so afraid of? That's the part that baffles me. How does someone living their life in their sphere cause so much terror among complete strangers?
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeri Dalbec (+3266) 10 years ago
It may partly be that they fear getting killed if they are of any persuasion other than the "perfect Christian" who thinks he is standing in for God???? Wonder where, "Thou shalt not kill" went???
Sure have to be careful of the "Koolaid" that you drink:-) Must be a new meaning to "Spreading the Word"!!!!
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
Amorette Allison wrote:
What are these people so afraid of? That's the part that baffles me. How does someone living their life in their sphere cause so much terror among complete strangers?


Here is a link to the first two chapters of a book entitled The God Virus: How religion infects our lives and culture.

http://www.thegodvirus.ne...ro_1_2.pdf

You will want to read the whole book, but Dr. Ray does a very good job of explaining the "why".
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeri Dalbec (+3266) 10 years ago
Thank you, Richard. A good read. Now I have to read the rest of the book:-) Sure covers a lot of "stuff"!!!
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
Here is a remark from Richard Bonehead
[Here is a link to the first two chapters of a book entitled The God Virus:}

So you liberals are a bunch of self proclaimed atheist, keep opening mouth and inserting foot. As I said before, not even a speed bump in the future.
And I don't fear their lifestyle, I hope their happy, I just don't want to propagate the immorality of their lifestyle towards the younger generations.
I think that some of the people with serious sexual genetic defficiencies should be left alone, but the people that are straight one day and bi the next are really just perverts. And we know from other cases that sexual perverseness leads to more and more extreme sexual frustration. These are the kinds of people that tortured frogs and lizards as kids, and should not be given the same benenfit as those with real medical testosterone or estogene troubles.
I hope we can find some type of medical help for people with sexual genetic problems, but the "by choice perverts" can go to the fenced in island.
Let us not forget that statistics show that a large portion of serial killers and violent offender started out with sexual orientation issues. As to some of your remarks about me and my sexual conduct, I am and always have been straight, all but one of my ex girl friends have been very attractive. However I have the most attractive one with me now, and tonight will be as good as the last. I feel sorry for you Homosexual sympathisers, but maybe you have to be on their side in order to justify your own set of knee pads.
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
milescity wrote:

And we know from other cases that sexual perverseness leads to more and more extreme sexual frustration. These are the kinds of people that tortured frogs and lizards as kids, and should not be given the same benenfit as those with real medical testosterone or estogene troubles.
I hope we can find some type of medical help for people with sexual genetic problems, but the "by choice perverts" can go to the fenced in island.
Let us not forget that statistics show that a large portion of serial killers and violent offender started out with sexual orientation issues.



If you are going to make such assertions you should provide a source. So, what statistics? Please substantiate your claim.

I'd also encourage you, milescity, to do some reading and get a clue with regard to human sexual history. Sex at Dawn by Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jethá would be a great place to start. There is no reason to remain so ignorant.
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2736) 10 years ago
There is no reason to remain so ignorant.


But Richard, it is sooo blissful!
Top
Posted by ABE (+415) 10 years ago
Huh, I seem to have read about a guy who tried to clean people's genetics once. It didn't work out that great.
Who the procreate are you to tell people what to do. I say get an island and send all the people that think everyone needs saved, and send them there with their bibles and nothing else. Let's see how long they survive.
Ohhhh, new show idea. " Christian survivor". Where God's on everyones team! Yeah!

[This message has been edited by ABE (5/28/2012)]
Top
supporter
Posted by Bridgier (+9297) 10 years ago
And I don't fear their lifestyle, I hope their happy, I just don't want to propagate the immorality of their lifestyle towards the younger generations.

If this is what you're afraid of you've already lost. The "younger generation" DOESN'T GIVE A POOP ABOUT YOUR STUPID CULTURE WARS. They don't care about gay marriage, they don't care about miscegenation - they've moved on.

Eventually, all the stupid people will get old and die, and your brand of bigotry will fade away.

Thank god.
Top
Posted by Mandi (+357) 10 years ago
I have found that the so called "good christians" are sometimes the most judgmental and intolerant people. I think that sometimes people justify their ignorance and hypocracy with being a "good christian." The most important thing a person can believe and teach their children is to be kind and tolerant of all peoples beliefs and tendencies. Golden rule, people!!!!
Top
Posted by luvlife (+291) 10 years ago
I agree with you, Mandi. milescity certainly shows a very sad side of "Christianity". I am a Christian and I believe that is being loving and kind to all walks. He sounds very hateful and full of evil. It's people like milescity that give Christians a bad name. Give me a world full of "gay" (wow...i dislike labels) human beings over a world full of milescity human beings.

We are ALL God's people. He LOVE's us ALL. No one is perfect and we will all die sinner's......so, the one thing we can give to one another on this earth in our brief time here, is to LOVE one another and QUIT judging.
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
Serial Killers
Early Signs and Murders

Criminology
April 16th, 2010

In early years of childhood, you may be able to recognize warning signs of a serial killer. Serial killers at a young age may start out by harming and torturing small animals. In some cases they will spend hours inflicting a slow death. This act of sadism is a form of control, and allows the person to receive the power they crave.

Another early sign of a serial killer is bedwetting. Over sixty percent of serial killers wet their bed past the age of twelve. (Fisher) Bedwetting may be a sign of abuse. It can inflict emotional pain on the child. In some serial killers the parents would abuse the child by making fun of them, or calling them names, and this is very embarrassing. Some serial killers had a nickname such as â_oPissyâ__ and people in the neighborhood would call him by that name.

One of the largest signs of future violence is a fascination with fire. Some serial killers would start out by just burning small objects, then later move on to setting small animals on fire, such as cats. Once boredom kicks in some may even go as far as burning down homes and causing a great amount of damage.

When most serial killers were young, they were very anti-social. They would withdraw themselves from society and not care about anyone else but their selves. This is known as Anti-Social Personality Disorder. Some may later be very social as they mature. Most if not all serial killers had some form of sexual deviance, including sexual violence.

There are too many other references toname, but if you insist, I will get you a page or two of links to proffesional papers by leading researchers thatr document the ties between sexual deviancy and violent natures.
Top
supporter
Posted by Jeri Dalbec (+3266) 10 years ago
Sometimes I think "milescity" is "yanking our chain":-)
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
www.athenaresearchgroup.org/sexualdeviance.htm


Here is another article from the athens crimnal research group, just one of many that draw a correlation betwen sexual deviate natures and how they progress into more and more violent acts of human domination.
Homosexualality is not all that diferent from being a bully, in that it has a progressive nature about its self. If a bully goes unchecked for any length of time, there mentality turns to a more violent and bullyish demeanor. This is why we end up with police oficers that go from nice people to control freaks, to gulags. It is the old saying that absolute power currupts.
The continued nature of any act will beget its self in a more extreme fashion, this is the nature of a personality (flaw in the instance of homosexuality). Simularly if you go to church, and try to live according to his teachings, then it begets more righteousness. All things are progressive in nature, so if we allow sexual deviancy even at a somewhat questionable level, the next generation will be fighting the more extreme version of which we should have stoppped.
Top
supporter
Posted by Denise Selk (+1664) 10 years ago
The "younger generation" DOESN'T GIVE A POOP ABOUT YOUR STUPID CULTURE WARS. They don't care about gay marriage, they don't care about miscegenation - they've moved on.


QFT
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
You are right denise, they don't care, that is evident by any one of Jerry Springers shows.
Top
supporter
Posted by Bridgier (+9297) 10 years ago
Uhmm... I doubt the "younger generation" is watching a lot of jerry springer.
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4454) 10 years ago
If milescity isn't a bedwetting, sexual deviant, the Pope isn't Catholic.

If he were a woman, he'd have been a Psych major.

[This message has been edited by Buck Showalter (5/29/2012)]
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
I spent six years as an alter boy, and am a catholic. If you want to insult me, then bring it on, but leave the Pope out of this would you? If you choose to side with Lucifer and sexual deviate personallities, then have at it. But to use the name of my town as your spring board to an audience is similar to hiding behind something, or useing something to propell your BS opinions. God is good all the time, All the time God is good!
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4454) 10 years ago
Dude, you wouldn't be so hung up on gays if you weren't one yourself. It's that simple.

Admit it and free yourself, you'll be much happier.

[This message has been edited by Buck Showalter (5/29/2012)]
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2736) 10 years ago
I love how he wants to leave the Pope out of it. That man has covered up more child rape than any man alive!
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4454) 10 years ago
Priests are probably responsible for his bedwetting.
Top
Posted by Kacey (+3153) 10 years ago
It is just so sad. All the priests having sex with altar boys...but they aren't gay? The Pope has known..as all popes who have gone before him have known.

It's JUST NOT NATURAL for men to abstain from sex. So they use those they can to feed their needs.

But gay people who freely choose to partner with each other are the ones damned to hell? I think not.
Top
Posted by Mathew Schmitz (+278) 10 years ago
I need more thumbs. 2 thumbs up is not nearly enough support for that comment Kacey. You hit the nail squarely on the head.
Top
supporter
Posted by Bridgier (+9297) 10 years ago
This is going to end in double-wetsuit territory, I just know it.
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
milescity wrote:
I spent six years as an alter boy, and am a catholic. If you want to insult me, then bring it on, but leave the Pope out of this would you? If you choose to side with Lucifer and sexual deviate personallities, then have at it. But to use the name of my town as your spring board to an audience is similar to hiding behind something, or useing something to propell your BS opinions. God is good all the time, All the time God is good!



As one who was sexually abused by a former principal of Sacred Heart Grade School at an altar boy sleep-over, I think I have an understanding of your pain and anger. My guess is that you may have experienced some similar abuse in the past. If that is the case, I am sorry for your experience.

It is important, however, to distinguish between homosexual behavior and pedophilia. One is based on love the other is based on selfishness. It is in making these distinctions you may begin to find some healing. Life is too short to waste your days being angry at people in the past.
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17668) 10 years ago
Life is too short to waste your days being angry at people in the past.


I don't know about that.....seven years later, I am still mad as hell at Bill Belichick, and I'm quite comfortable with that.
Top
Posted by luvlife (+291) 10 years ago
Richard, I just wanted to say that I appreciate your honesty and putting that out there. You could help many others...so, thank you
and very well said.

I have a cousin that had a similiar experience (not with associated with the church)...but, a adult man whom was in a leader position. It was very hard for him and still is to this day.

Thank you for speaking up.
Top
supporter
Posted by howdy (+4949) 10 years ago
Agree Richard about your honesty and how refreshing it is...I, too, was abused as a child and have had a hard time dealing with it...The more you talk about it, the better it is IMO...
Top
supporter
Posted by Stone (+1590) 10 years ago
"A fool's brain digests philosophy into folly, science into superstition, and art into pedantry. Hence University education."

George B. Shaw

It should have said- A fools brain digests religion into fact and science into superstition.

Another good GBS quote- "All great truths begin as blasphemies."

[This message has been edited by Stone (5/29/2012)]
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
Father cliff and Stredney were very honorable men. There has never been, to my knowledge, any funny business of any kind in the Saint Josephs catholic church of New waverly Texas. I followed a strict set of classes as an alter boy, untill confirmation at the age of 14.
However, now that there are bi-ligual services, as the Mexicans take over the religion, I can not speak to what there culture sees as sexually correct. I here they have some kind of Donkey show on the other side of the border, so I can only assume they are just as sexually disturbed as the rest of you liberals here at MC.commie.
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17668) 10 years ago
You do have a point about how sexually disturbed we liberals are, Danny....anymore, when I see a Subaru Outback or Legacy coming down the street with a Coexist bumper sticker on its tail, I get a stiffie.
Top
supporter
Posted by Bob L. (+5100) 10 years ago
How dare those Mexicans go to church!
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2736) 10 years ago
For you milescity...

Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 10 years ago
Whoo Hoo and Yee Haw!!

Ain't no homo gonna make it to heaven. Now there are some young men being raised non politically correct, but very morally correct. I will take Moral correctness over Political correctness any day, as would most heterosexual men and women in America. Just because your liberal views are predominant here in cyber space, does not mean your ideals hold any water in the real world. Once again "not even a speed bump for the conservative christians of this town". God is good "all the time" All the time "God is good".
Top
supporter
Posted by Gunnar Emilsson (+17668) 10 years ago
The "real world" meaning the keno machines at Lucky Lil's.
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 10 years ago
milescity wrote:
Whoo Hoo and Yee Haw!!

Ain't no homo gonna make it to heaven. Now there are some young men being raised non politically correct, but very morally correct. I will take Moral correctness over Political correctness any day, as would most heterosexual men and women in America. Just because your liberal views are predominant here in cyber space, does not mean your ideals hold any water in the real world. Once again "not even a speed bump for the conservative christians of this town". God is good "all the time" All the time "God is good".


A question, milescity:

Do you seriously believe that God will judge someone for loving a person of the same sex, but not judge you for hating someone you have never met?
Top
Posted by Mathew Schmitz (+278) 9 years ago
Nail - Meet Richards hammer. I was having exactly the same thoughts Richard, but you put it in words much better than I would have. Thank you.

[This message has been edited by Mathew Schmitz (5/30/2012)]
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 9 years ago
{Do you seriously believe that God will judge someone for loving a person of the same sex, but not judge you for hating someone you have never met?}

I don't think love can exist between 2 people of the same sex, unless there exist a serious medical condition. So no, God will not judge those with medical problems (except in a positive light), but those "part time this" and "part time that" (bi-seuals) will be judged harshly since they had a conscious choice to make and chose wrongly.

Furthermore, I do not hate anyone, I advocate segregation from people of liberals lifestyles, not war with them. This is where your kind always muddy the waters between intergartion, segregation, and war to provide complete separation. The middle ground to a social issue will always be segregation. While the extreme left will be intergration, and the extreme right will be war for forced separation.
I advocate segregation so that hate does not eventually take shape and control of each faction, doing away with the middle ground of segregation.
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2736) 9 years ago
I advocate segregation so that hate does not eventually take shape and control of each faction, doing away with the middle ground of segregation.


Your hate has already taken shape and it is an ugly beast.
Top
supporter
Posted by Wendy Wilson (+6171) 9 years ago
The problem of us v. them derives from our oldest biological survival instincts. If the "us" stays together it can protect itself from the "them", who may just be the tribe who lives downriver. That instinct drives all humans to categorize each other. Fortunately as we learn new ways to co-exist with the other our species becomes better at seeing our commonalities rather than our differences. You can't really blame milescity for acting on his ancient Cro Magnon instincts. He just hasn't gotten the memo yet.
Top
Posted by luvlife (+291) 9 years ago
OMG milescity, you just have all the answers, don't you?

Good luck with the rest of your life with your cruelness and defiant attitude. Person's (like yourself) are forgetting one of God's most important message as we go through this life....

that is~~~LOVE ONE ANOTHER~~~!!!

Hatred and Bigotry will get you no where milescity. Nothing more to say to you except I truely feel sorry for you and will say a prayer for you to quit judging whom YOU feel will make it to Heaven. When did God give you that right, anyway???
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 9 years ago
milescity wrote:
{Do you seriously believe that God will judge someone for loving a person of the same sex, but not judge you for hating someone you have never met?}

I don't think love can exist between 2 people of the same sex, unless there exist a serious medical condition. So no, God will not judge those with medical problems (except in a positive light), but those "part time this" and "part time that" (bi-seuals) will be judged harshly since they had a conscious choice to make and chose wrongly.

Furthermore, I do not hate anyone, I advocate segregation from people of liberals lifestyles, not war with them. This is where your kind always muddy the waters between intergartion, segregation, and war to provide complete separation. The middle ground to a social issue will always be segregation. While the extreme left will be intergration, and the extreme right will be war for forced separation.
I advocate segregation so that hate does not eventually take shape and control of each faction, doing away with the middle ground of segregation.




So my conclusion is that attempting to have a rational discussion with you, milescity, is like playing chess with a pigeon; you knock over all of the pieces, poop on the board, and strut around like you won the game.

milecity said
I don't think love can exist between 2 people of the same sex, unless there exist a serious medical condition.


Here is an example from the bible you claim to believe that is opposite of your opinion:

1 Samuel 20

1Then David fled from Naioth at Ramah and went to Jonathan and asked, "What have I done? What is my crime? How have I wronged your father, that he is trying to kill me?"

2 "Never!" Jonathan replied. "You are not going to die! Look, my father doesn't do anything, great or small, without letting me know. Why would he hide this from me? It isn't so!"

3 But David took an oath and said, "Your father knows very well that I have found favor in your eyes, and he has said to himself, `Jonathan must not know this or he will be grieved.' Yet as surely as the Lord lives and as you live, there is only a step between me and death."

4 Jonathan said to David, "Whatever you want me to do, I'll do for you."

5 So David said, "Look, tomorrow is the New Moon feast, and I am supposed to dine with the king; but let me go and hide in the field until the evening of the day after tomorrow. 6 If your father misses me at all, tell him, `David earnestly asked my permission to hurry to Bethlehem, his hometown, because an annual sacrifice is being made there for his whole clan.' 7 If he says, `Very well,' then your servant is safe. But if he loses his temper, you can be sure that he is determined to harm me. 8 As for you, show kindness to your servant, for you have brought him into a covenant with you before the Lord. If I am guilty, then kill me yourself! Why hand me over to your father?"

9 "Never!" Jonathan said. "If I had the least inkling that my father was determined to harm you, wouldn't I tell you?"

10 David asked, "Who will tell me if your father answers you harshly?"

11 "Come," Jonathan said, "let's go out into the field." So they went there together.

12 Then Jonathan said to David, "I swear by the Lord, the God of Israel, that I will surely sound out my father by this time the day after tomorrow! If he is favorably disposed toward you, will I not send you word and let you know? 13 But if my father intends to harm you, may the Lord deal with Jonathan, be it ever so severely, if I do not let you know and send you away in peace. May the Lord be with you as he has been with my father. 14 But show me unfailing kindness like the Lord's kindness as long as I live, so that I may not be killed, 15 and do not ever cut off your kindness from my family -not even when the Lord has cut off every one of David's enemies from the face of the earth."

16 So Jonathan made a covenant with the house of David, saying, "May the Lord call David's enemies to account. " 17 And Jonathan had David reaffirm his oath out of love for him, because he loved him as he loved himself.


Try harder!
Top
supporter
Posted by Bridgier (+9297) 9 years ago
So my conclusion is that attempting to have a rational discussion with you, milescity, is like playing chess with a pigeon; you knock over all of the pieces, poop on the board, and strut around like you won the game.


Sweet marzipan mary, that's a nice turn of phrase...
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4454) 9 years ago
Richard is a good cat.
Top
Top
Posted by Judd (+58) 9 years ago
You shouldn't argue with a fool because onlookers wont be able to tell the difference.
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 9 years ago
Richard are you really so dumb as to not be able to differentiate between the Love (comrodery) between two friends, and Love (marriage)with a physical component. You seem like the type to think if someone is your friend, they should prove it by helping you get your rocks off. Really, this is a sick comparison you are making. I like all of my friends, but my physical show of emotions are relegated to the ones I love in that way, and this mannerism is not possible amoungst people of the same sex(without a seriouse medical condition). I love a few friends for being there when I needed them, but I am not going to stick my tongue in their mouth as a show of gratitude. Get right! you left!
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2736) 9 years ago
Okay milescity, what is this "serious medical condition" of which you speak. What is its name?
Top
supporter
Posted by Bridgier (+9297) 9 years ago
I think the words you are looking for are agape, phileo and eros - but you're too procreating stupid to understand that these terms don't require gender for their definitions.

You're probably one of those deep thinkers that think gay people want to marry their box-turtles or their poodles because THEY JUST DO THAT'S WHY, aren't you?
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 9 years ago
milescity wrote:
Richard are you really so dumb as to not be able to differentiate between the Love (comrodery) between two friends, and Love (marriage)with a physical component. You seem like the type to think if someone is your friend, they should prove it by helping you get your rocks off. Really, this is a sick comparison you are making. I like all of my friends, but my physical show of emotions are relegated to the ones I love in that way, and this mannerism is not possible amoungst people of the same sex(without a seriouse medical condition). I love a few friends for being there when I needed them, but I am not going to stick my tongue in their mouth as a show of gratitude. Get right! you left!


"Saul and Jonathan, beloved and lovely!
In life and in death they were not divided;
they were swifter than eagles,
they were stronger than lions.
How the mighty have fallen in the midst of battle!
Jonathan lies slain upon your high places.
I am distressed for you my brother Jonathan;
Greatly beloved were you to me;
your love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women."

(2 Samuel 1:23, 26-27)
Top
supporter
Posted by Buck Showalter (+4454) 9 years ago
Kirby - hahahahaahahahahahaahahaha

Hey Daniel KIRBY Allen - why don't you move to Glendive with the rest of the Hoovers and Dysons?

YOU SUCK! (balls)
Top
supporter
sponsor
Posted by Hannah Nash (+2541) 9 years ago
So my conclusion is that attempting to have a rational discussion with you, milescity, is like playing chess with a pigeon; you knock over all of the pieces, poop on the board, and strut around like you won the game.


Richard-- next time you're in Miles City, remind me that I owe you a drink! Excellent phrasing, sir. Well stated.
Top
Posted by milescity (+60) 9 years ago
Kelly, the disease is called "homosexuality",and I hope they can cure it.

Richard very class, (reverting to name calling is a sure sign of being on the short end of the stick), but you probably dont care about the size of the stick, you seem like the "motion of the ocean" type, judgeing by your "tolerance" for the afflicted


Can you say "winning"!
Top
founder
supporter
Posted by Amorette Allison (+11902) 9 years ago
Now, boys. Danny Allen is a skeered of coloreds and homos coz he thanks they trouser snakes are bigger than hizzun and he is a skeered of liberals coz he noz they brain pans is a bigger than hizzun. So don y'all pickin' on thet poor skeered mushhaid.

And stop pooping on Richard's chess board. Just because the game is too complex for you is no reason to behave so badly.

Heeheeheehee.
Top
supporter
Posted by Richard Bonine, Jr. (+15076) 9 years ago
milescity wrote:
Kelly, the disease is called "homosexuality",and I hope they can cure it.

Richard very class, (reverting to name calling is a sure sign of being on the short end of the stick), but you probably dont care about the size of the stick, you seem like the "motion of the ocean" type, judgeing by your "tolerance" for the afflicted


Can you say "winning"!



Sir, I have exercised significant restraint in NOT resorting to "name calling". The fact that you apparently can't understand simple "word pictures" that describe your behavior is not my problem.

I once believed as you do. But, I took seriously the biblical admonition to "study and show yourself approved, a workman that need not be ashamed". I simply followed the science of this subject (human sexuality) where it lead, not where I necessarily wanted it to go. I changed my views to conform to scientific FACT. Homosexuality is NOT a "disease". To call it such is to revert to "name calling" which by your own definition, puts YOU, milescity, "on the short end of the stick".

It is your choice to remain ignorant and ashamed. Conversely, you can pickup some books and start reading. I'd encourage you to start forming your "opinion" based on science and not your own ignorant bigotry.
Top
supporter
Posted by Kelly (+2736) 9 years ago
'Fraid you are wrong again milescity!

Psychology was one of the first disciplines to study homosexuality as a discrete phenomenon. Prior to and throughout most of the 20th century, common standard psychology viewed homosexuality in terms of pathological models as a mental illness. That classification began to be subjected to critical scrutiny in the research, which consistently failed to produce any empirical or scientific basis for regarding homosexuality as a disorder or abnormality. As a result of such accumulated research, professionals in medicine, mental health, and the behavioral and social sciences, opposing the classification of homosexuality as a mental disorder, claimed the conclusion that it was inaccurate, and that the DSM classification reflected untested assumptions that were based on once-prevalent social norms and clinical impressions from unrepresentative samples which consisted of patients seeking therapy and individuals whose conduct brought them into the criminal justice system.[1]
Since the 1970s, the consensus of the behavioral and social sciences and the health and mental health professions globally is that homosexuality is a normal variation of human sexual orientation, while there remain those who maintain that it is a disorder.[2] In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder. The American Psychological Association Council of Representatives followed in 1975.[3] Thereafter other major mental health organizations followed and it was finally declassified by the World Health Organization in 1990. Consequently, while some still believe homosexuality is a mental disorder, the current research and clinical literature demonstrate that same-sex sexual and romantic attractions, feelings, and behaviors are normal and positive variations of human sexuality, reflecting the official positions of the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association.


http://en.wikipedia.org/w...psychology

[This message has been edited by Kelly (5/31/2012)]
Top
supporter
Posted by howdy (+4949) 9 years ago
Top