Posted by (+4461) 17 years ago
This what it looks like on paper. Everyone try and sway me - my vote counts, plus I can't really interpret what for or against means on this one. This is some slippery writing.
A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PEDITION
This measure may require reduced future expenditures in servearal areas of government serveices where caseloads historically have grown at a rate exceeding cobined growth in population and inflation, such as correctional poplulation and Medicaid recipients, or may require reduced future expenditures in other areas to offset those increasing caseload consts.
- For limiting the increase in appropriations to the combined growth rate of population and inflation, or the largest spending limit for any previous biennium.
- Against the liminting the increase in appropriations to the combined growth rate of poplulation and inflations, or the largest spending limit for any prvious biennium.
A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PEDITION
This measure may require reduced future expenditures in servearal areas of government serveices where caseloads historically have grown at a rate exceeding cobined growth in population and inflation, such as correctional poplulation and Medicaid recipients, or may require reduced future expenditures in other areas to offset those increasing caseload consts.
- For limiting the increase in appropriations to the combined growth rate of population and inflation, or the largest spending limit for any previous biennium.
- Against the liminting the increase in appropriations to the combined growth rate of poplulation and inflations, or the largest spending limit for any prvious biennium.