I don't blame the Mayor for vetoing the dog variance for an abused and abandoned pets, because the person who wants the variance has more than 3 dogs of her/his own at her/his house, and there is a law that if your in the city, you are only allowed to have 3 dogs, if you have more than 3 dogs you should have a kennel license. In the article in last night's miles city star, the person wanting the variance said she/he would have no more than 8 dogs, having more than 3 dogs of her/his own, then add 8 more the neighbors would have to put up with 12, 16, who knows how many barking dogs, which would not be fair to the neighbors, if the person want's the variance then she/he should get rid of some of his/her own dogs, so he/she would only have 8 dogs at a time. The person wanting the variance should have to build a warm kennel building with kennel runs, that have drains, so the dog potty can be rinsed of with hot water from a hose, Is the person wanting the variance going to be home full time to take care of the pets in the shelter, because in a shelter the kennels should be cleaned 4 or 5 times a day, when the pet goes potty, or does the person wanting the variance work somewhere else full time and won't be home to care for the animals at the shelter, A shelter is a full time job itself.