I am curious as to what you think would be found on a "long form" that is not found on his Certification of Live Birth.
It is true that some "short form" certificates lack information:
Per Wikipedia:Long forms, also known as certified photocopies, book copies, and photostat copies, are exact photocopies of the original birth record that was prepared by the hospital or attending physician at the time of the child's birth.[19] The long form usually includes parents' information (address of residence, race, birth place, date of birth, etc.), additional information on the child's birthplace, and information on the doctors who assisted in the birth of the child. The long form also usually includes the signature of the doctor involved and at least one of the parents.[20]
Short forms, known sometimes as computer certifications, are not universally available, but are less expensive and more readily accessible. Information is taken from the original birth record (the long form) and stored in a database that can be accessed quickly when birth certificates are needed in a short amount of time. Whereas the long form is a copy of the actual birth certificate, a short form is a document that certifies the existence of such certificate, and is given a title such as "Certification of Birth", "Certification of Live Birth", or "Certificate of Birth Registration." The short form typically includes the child's name, date of birth, sex, and place of birth, although some also include the names of the child's parents.
When the certification does include the names of the parents, it can be used in lieu of a long form birth certificate in almost all circumstances [19]. Nearly all states in the U.S. issue short forms certifications, on both state and local levels.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Since Obama's Certification of Live Birth contains all of the information you would find on a typical "long form", I'm confused as to your point. Perhaps you are confused as to the definitions of "long form" vs. "short form".

Anyhow, if you are conceding that his birth should not be questioned, what's the point of the discussion in the first place? If his place of birth is a fact, there would be absolutely no reason to use "maybes" unless you are simply trying to rile the masses.
[This message has been edited by Denise Selk (4/9/2010)]