The AFDB Debate
Posted by Hal Neumann (+9958) 12 years ago
Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie (AFDB): Pros & Cons

On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets: An Empirical Study
Ali Rahimi, Ben Recht , Jason Taylor , Noah Vawter
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
17 Feb 2005

Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals. We investigate the efficacy of three aluminum helmet designs on a sample group of four individuals. Using a $250,000 network analyser, we find that although on average all helmets attenuate invasive radio frequencies in either directions (either emanating from an outside source, or emanating from the cranium of the subject), certain frequencies are in fact greatly amplified. These amplified frequencies coincide with radio bands reserved for government use according to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). Statistical evidence suggests the use of helmets may in fact enhance the government's invasive abilities. We speculate that the government may in fact have started the helmet craze for this reason. . . .

Continued at:

Informational video:
= = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = =

Rebuttal To The MIT Anti-AFDB Study: AFDB Effectiveness
Lyle Zapato
November 11, 2005

A recent MIT study [1] calls into question the effectiveness of Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanies. However, there are serious flaws in this study, not the least of which is a complete mischaracterization of the process of psychotronic mind control. I theorize that the study is, in fact, NWO propaganda designed to spread FUD against deflector beanie technology, and aluminum shielding in general, in order to disembeanie paranoids leaving them open to mind control. . . .

Continued at: